• Description
    Bureau Annexe 27A suggests creating a mandatory “Task Setter” for Cat 1 PG XC events. The task setter would be an individual not competing and would replace the current task committee. They must be extremely familiar with the flying venue and have experience setting tasks. They would perform the role at the test event so their competence can be evaluated alongside the rest of the organizing team. Are you in favor of this?

    Should Cat 1 PG XC events require a mandatory non-competing Task Setter to replace the task committee?

    Yes - create "Task Setters"
    48% (12 votes)
    No - don't create
    52% (13 votes)
    Total votes: 25

  • Annexe 41-GBR-2 suggests reducing trim tolerance from +/-20 to +/-10. PWCA has already declared their intent to make this change, without consulting pilots. Are you in favor of this?

    Yes - reduce trim tolerance
    84% (21 votes)
    No - don't reduce
    16% (4 votes)
    Total votes: 25

  • Bureau Annexe 27C and 41-ARG-2 suggest requiring the use of performance equalizers. Are you in favor?

    Yes – require equalizers
    56% (25 votes)
    No – don't require equalizers
    44% (20 votes)
    Total votes: 45
  • Description
    Bureau Annexe 27D proposes reinstating the 2019 ballast limit.
    The total weight, including all flight equipment and glider, must not exceed 33 kg in addition to the pilot’s weight. Only water and sand are allowed as ballast. As an exception, all pilots are allowed to ballast up to a total weight of 95 kg including all flight equipment and glider.

    Bureau Annexe 27D proposes reinstating a max weight of 33kg including all equipment. Are you in favor?

    Yes – reinstate max weight limit
    39% (17 votes)
    No – do not reinstate
    61% (27 votes)
    Total votes: 44
  • Description
    Bureau Annexe 27E suggests creating a new Lightweight class for wings of max certified weight <95kg. The scoring categories would thus be Overall, Lightweight, and Women.

    Bureau Annexe 27E suggests creating a new Lightweight class for wings of max certified weight <95kg. Are you in favor?

    Yes – create Lightweight class
    73% (33 votes)
    No – don't create
    27% (12 votes)
    Total votes: 45
  • Description
    CIVL sport class working group propose this definition for sport class paragliders :
    1. EN-C Certification
    2. Limited flat aspect Ratio of 6,7
    3. Speed limiter

    The designers we consulted shared their inputs here : https://gagglereport.org/node/145

    What's your opinion on sport class defined by CIVL

    I agree with CIVL definition
    10% (18 votes)
    Not sure but I trust CIVL working group
    4% (7 votes)
    Apparently this need much more work
    71% (123 votes)
    It's a bad definition
    7% (12 votes)
    I don't have an opinion
    8% (13 votes)
    Total votes: 173
  • Description
    - Yes the problem is widespread and affect most pilots.
    - Yes there is a problem but mainly for pilots below 60 Kg.
    - No there is no problem with ballast. Anyone can carry what he can.
    - I don't know

    Do you believe XC paragliding has a problem related to ballast ?

    Yes I do. It's a major and widespread issue
    65% (140 votes)
    Yes but it affects mainly the lightest pilots (below 60 kg)
    28% (61 votes)
    No I don't. Ballast is not a problem
    3% (6 votes)
    I don't have an opinion
    4% (8 votes)
    Total votes: 215
  • Description
    - Gagglerport.org could allow us to develop the exact community tool we need. We have almost 200 regitered people already. Database, role management, custom poll, survey... It is lacking a lot of features and is only 5 days old.
    - Github is a full featured project management plateform well supported across the techies and the pilot community.
    - Basecamp is a plateform used by CIVL, neat and clean. Many users are already experimented with it.

    What main community plateform should we use ?

    Stay on gagglereport.org
    49% (99 votes)
    Move to a Github community
    2% (5 votes)
    Move to our own Basecamp
    3% (7 votes)
    I don't have an opinion
    45% (91 votes)
    Total votes: 202
  • Description
    Please leave a feedback !

    How was the first visioconference ?

    Perfect. Thanks !
    33% (65 votes)
    Nice start but many points stayed unclear
    13% (25 votes)
    Surprising ! I'm feeling a bit lost...
    3% (5 votes)
    I didn't see the visioconference yet
    53% (105 votes)
    Total votes: 200
  • Description
    - WhatsApp is the most popular and we have 400+ users already registered.
    - Telegram is technically offering much more options (Bot and automated task with the website would be possible). It's almost mandatory for XC competition anyway (probably well supported around the community ?).
    - Discord is full featured and built for community management but probably a bit more geeky and less downloaded by default ?

    Which instant messaging tool should the community use ?

    Stay on WhatsApp
    50% (116 votes)
    Move to Telegram
    38% (87 votes)
    Move to Discord
    13% (29 votes)
    Total votes: 232