By Mateusz Gajczewski on Fri, 17 Oct 2025 - 22:33

It would be very beneficial to improve communication between what’s happening in the air and the responsible Safety Director, as well as clarify the communication protocols.

We’re currently missing clear protocols on how to react to certain situations, for example:
- If 3+ pilots call Level 3 – Marshall, any Safety Committee members or the Meet Director must respond within ~2 minutes.
- Wind over 30 km/h (generally, with adjustments communicated in advance for specific tasks or locations) should trigger a task stop – maybe windspeed data could be retrieved from the trackers?

Appointing a Marshal could improve safety oversight, but it also raises several considerations:
- Potentially higher operational costs.
- The Safety Director, and any Marshals if required, should ideally remain independent from the Organizer.
- The Marshal may not be present where a hazardous situation occurs.

By the way, Chrigiel mentioned a similar idea during the last Couldbase Mayhem podcast.

3 in favour | 0 against
Organiser
By DusanO on Sun, 19 Oct 2025 - 22:56

Air Marshal, would/could improve safety. And I'm also in favour for that.
But it raises a question. How to get that person, for a competition? In reality, it would be hard to get one. (At least for CAT2).
It will also raise the competition costs.
Therfore, i would make this mandatory only for CAT1 events. And only a proposal (not mandatory) for CAT2 events.
Also, an Air Marshal, could have second role. To help in multimedia - filming in the air, etc...

1 in favour | 0 against
By christiaandurrant on Wed, 22 Oct 2025 - 12:03

What is wrong with having members of the task committee / safety committee plus all 120 pilots on safety freq reporting conditions directly to committee?

By Joachim Oberhauser on Wed, 29 Oct 2025 - 18:34

On Worlds in Feltre we got 2 Airmarshals (2 expert pilots from Feltreclub) during the tasks. What I remember the feedback was good.

1 in favour | 0 against