I agree with the issue you raise, but I would propose a different solution.
At the moment I perceive there is a bigger problem in the points distribution in, say, PWC events and SRS events. By way of example, consider this:
1/ Currently the winners points are calculated according to the quality of pilots attending. This works fine. 90 points for a PWC is right. 70 points for an SRS is right. 40 points for a smaller event is right.
2/ 0.1 point for the person that comes last is also correct.
3/ My problem is that the points between are linear. This is not fair. They should be based on the event results in some way. So if the winner of a PWC has 3,000 points and you come 20th with 2,900 points, you are almost as good as the winner. But in an SRS event, probably the 20th person has half the points and skill of the winner. I therefore believe the WPRS score should be based on a curve according to the results in the event. A curve, so it has averaging still, rather than a direct percentage. In that, a fixed percentage could also be forced for 1st, 2nd, 3rd. So, winning is worth at least 2% more than 2nd, but 4th downwards is more in line with the overall score.
The above will devalue the result of many of the Sports pilots at Sports events and will enhance results at PWC's. But winners will still get the same predicted reward for winning, regardless of the event format.
You must also recognise that giving too large a reward for the winner could have a negative affect on safety.
Comments
PWCA Board
CIVL Delegate
This change is independent of Kuba Sto´s proposal acceptance or not.
It can be applied to actual WPRS and it can be applied to Kuba Sto´s proposal as well.